2000
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-97602000000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods employed to evaluate antioxidant capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are within the range obtained from other flavonoids [9]. On the other hand, it is possible to affirm that these results are markedly depends upon the stable free radical employed, because the kinetics of the process are usually complex [14].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These values are within the range obtained from other flavonoids [9]. On the other hand, it is possible to affirm that these results are markedly depends upon the stable free radical employed, because the kinetics of the process are usually complex [14].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…28,7 In fact, the TAR/ TRAP ratio (proposed as a measured of the antioxidant quality) of red and white wines were 0.5 and 0.6, respectively. 7 The similarity in TAR/TRAP and ORAC-PGR/ORAC-FL values support the proposal that both ratios evaluate the mean reactivity of the antioxidants present in the samples.…”
Section: Use Of the Orac-pgr/orac-fl Ratio To Assess Antioxidant Qualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] These evidences have lead to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant capacity of wines using methodologies that involve different concepts and experimental conditions. [7][8][9][10] Among the employed assays, ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) is one of the most used methods. This assay evaluates the capacity of antioxidants (or their complex mixtures) to inhibit the bleaching of a target molecule (probe) induced by peroxyl radicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are considerable methodological and instrumental differences between these different methods (manipulation of reagents, processing of data, automation, possible interferences, etc.). Comparative studies of the methods of antioxidant activity have been published, and all conclude that each methodology gives different responses for the same compounds or samples [11,12,13,14]. For this reason, there is a clear requirement for a simple, rapid, and reliable method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%