2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40798-019-0196-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Methodological Approaches to Measuring Cycling Mechanical Efficiency

Abstract: Background Much is known about theoretical bases of different mechanical efficiency indices and effects of physiological and biomechanical factors to them. However, there are only a few studies available about practical bases and interactions between these efficiency indices, which were the aims of the present study. Methods Fourteen physically active men ( n = 12) and women ( n = 2) participated in this study. From … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a review article, 26 the mean DE of 14 studies was 23.8 ± 2.6%. Similar DE (23.8%) was reported in another study with sport science students 27 . Given the reported results in these studies, it appears that COVID‐19 patients may have decreased mechanical efficiency compared with healthy people and about 20% could be a reference value for DE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…According to a review article, 26 the mean DE of 14 studies was 23.8 ± 2.6%. Similar DE (23.8%) was reported in another study with sport science students 27 . Given the reported results in these studies, it appears that COVID‐19 patients may have decreased mechanical efficiency compared with healthy people and about 20% could be a reference value for DE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…To conclude with the analysis of mechanical efficiency, GE% and DE% did not correlate between them at Power peak , as already noted in previous works ( Broskey et al, 2015 ). Whilst DE informs about the averaged mechanical efficiency of an isolated musculoskeletal system, that is, the test as a whole, GE expresses the mechanical efficiency in any segment of this test, considering the metabolic behavior in the segment as a whole body ( Matomäki et al, 2019 ). In addition to the above-mentioned limitation of DE in order to evaluate the short tests in these populations, this index displayed larger heterogeneity and has shown to be either sensible to the testing protocols ( De Koning et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the indirect calorimetry data, energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates were calculated using Weir's formula under the assumption of negligible protein oxidation ( 39 ). In addition, gross exercise efficiency (GEE) was calculated as (W ext /E tot ) and net exercise efficiency (NEE) was calculated as [W ext /(E tot - E rest )] ( 40 ) from the submaximal exercise indirect calorimetry data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%