2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jofv.0000019838.01126.7c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Men and Women Arrested for Domestic Violence: Who Presents the Greater Threat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
127
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
127
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the results of a study of officers' inferences on the situational cues in domestic assaults suggest that officers tended to interpret that male victims had greater control over their actions and were more responsible in the assaults than female victims (Finn & Stalans, 1997). In comparing male and female arrestees, Henning and Feder (2004) found that male arrestees were more likely to have engaged in more serious physical assaults, used a weapon, have substance abuse problems, made homicidal and suicidal threats, been the reason of prior police interventions, carry a more severe criminal history, been the subject of more prior arrests for domestic violence, and have engaged in more extrafamilial violence. While the data used here did not include all the same variables as Henning and Feder (2004) nor achieve all the same results on similar factors, the results similarly found statistically significant gendered differences in the use of a weapon and prior victim assault.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the results of a study of officers' inferences on the situational cues in domestic assaults suggest that officers tended to interpret that male victims had greater control over their actions and were more responsible in the assaults than female victims (Finn & Stalans, 1997). In comparing male and female arrestees, Henning and Feder (2004) found that male arrestees were more likely to have engaged in more serious physical assaults, used a weapon, have substance abuse problems, made homicidal and suicidal threats, been the reason of prior police interventions, carry a more severe criminal history, been the subject of more prior arrests for domestic violence, and have engaged in more extrafamilial violence. While the data used here did not include all the same variables as Henning and Feder (2004) nor achieve all the same results on similar factors, the results similarly found statistically significant gendered differences in the use of a weapon and prior victim assault.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their research, Henning and Feder (2004) found support for the relevance of this factor in arrest decisions. In particular, male arrestees were more likely to have violated a protective order than female arrestees (Henning & Feder, 2004). While this study is quite informative, no other studies could be located that have investigated gender differences in the effects of protective order violations on arrest.…”
Section: Protective Ordersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several authors have criticized the use of act-based behavioral descriptions of intimate partner violence that make up the CTS (cf., Henning & Feder, 2004;Schwartz, 2000, for summaries). One criticism is that such descriptions (e.g., "I pushed or shoved my partner") are not specific enough to capture the intensity of the behavior in question or its potential to cause harm to the partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has examined the criminal histories of men and women who perpetrate IPV, and has found that a substantial subgroup of these men and women have prior convictions for crimes unrelated to partner abuse (Babcock et al, 2003;Busch & Rosenberg, 2004;Buzawa, Hotaling, Klein, & Byrne, 1999;DeLucia, Owens, Will, & McCoin, 1999;Henning & Feder, 2004;Moffitt et al, 2000Moffitt et al, , 2001. This research provides evidence for the interrelatedness of the three different types of crimes, and provides a rationale for assessing them all in the same sample.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Ipv Violent and Non-violent Crimementioning
confidence: 99%