2007
DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-2-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of mantle versus involved-field radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma: reduction in normal tissue dose and second cancer risk

Abstract: Background: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors who undergo radiotherapy experience increased risks of second cancers (SC) and cardiac sequelae. To reduce such risks, extended-field radiotherapy (RT) for HL has largely been replaced by involved field radiotherapy (IFRT). While it has generally been assumed that IFRT will reduce SC risks, there are few data that quantify the reduction in dose to normal tissues associated with modern RT practice for patients with mediastinal HL, and no estimates of the expected re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
90
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(78 reference statements)
4
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Involved field radiotherapy has been reported to give a median MHD of 17.2 Gy for prescribed doses of 35 Gy and involved node radiotherapy leads to even lower doses (median MHDs of 7.7-12.0 Gy for prescribed doses of 36 Gy). [33][34][35] Also, anthracycline doses are nowadays frequently lower than the doses received by the majority of patients in our study. Therefore, patients treated today are likely to be at a substantially lower risk of treatment-related HF than the patients included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Involved field radiotherapy has been reported to give a median MHD of 17.2 Gy for prescribed doses of 35 Gy and involved node radiotherapy leads to even lower doses (median MHDs of 7.7-12.0 Gy for prescribed doses of 36 Gy). [33][34][35] Also, anthracycline doses are nowadays frequently lower than the doses received by the majority of patients in our study. Therefore, patients treated today are likely to be at a substantially lower risk of treatment-related HF than the patients included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, two studies [26,30] showed a wide increased BC risk in case of exclusive mantle radiotherapy, but with a reduced risk by irradiation of mediastinum only or associated subdiaphragmatic RT, as well as CT use. Indeed, mediastinal RT alone (without axillary field such as in classical 'mantle" field) spares approximately 50% of the breast tissues [31] (especially upper external quadrants, the most common size of BC onset). On the other hand, both CT (especially with alkylating agents) and supradiaphragmatic RT induce a high rate of permanent menopause, which is a well-known protective factor against BC, whereas the role of splenectomy or subsequent BC risk is discussed.…”
Section: Specific Survival According To Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, it is important to give clear information to women and physicians on the long-term breast cancer risk, in order to perform a regular screening and facilitate diagnosis of in situ or very small invasive cancers, with a favourable long-term prognosis [48,49]. Finally, we can hope that optimal combinations of CT and involved field RT will reduce the absolute risk of secondary BC in young patients [26,31,50,51].…”
Section: Specific Survival According To Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f) For solid tumors, no spatial properties are taken into account. Effects of doseinhomogeneity can be taken into account with dose-volume histograms (Koh et al, 2007) but spatial factors during tumor progression are more complicated [e.g. (Enderling et al, 2007)].…”
Section: Some Weaknesses Of the Iip Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%