2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent studies have reviewed the complication and reoperation rate of each procedure. 4,6,7 However, minimal literature exists on the effect of hospital admissions before and after surgery. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients that have underwent an ACE procedure would have decreased hospital admissions for constipation in the postoperative setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have reviewed the complication and reoperation rate of each procedure. 4,6,7 However, minimal literature exists on the effect of hospital admissions before and after surgery. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients that have underwent an ACE procedure would have decreased hospital admissions for constipation in the postoperative setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, and continence rates were reported to be similar in both groups of patients [ 16 , 17 ]. However, Halleran et al reported that a cecostomy had less promising results as compared to a Malone appendicostomy in regard to leakage (22% vs. 3%), wound infections (28% vs. 7%), and the need for additional interventions (35%) for inability to flush, tube dislodgement, or major complications such as intraperitoneal spillage and tube misplacement in the ileum [ 18 ]. Cecostomy has also been shown to be associated with a higher rate of postoperative abdominal pain (54% vs. 14%) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Antegrade Continence Enemasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications common to all approaches include leakage at the skin and skin infection. Both carry equivalent likelihood of continence, and outcomes surrounding superiority of either are mixed [100,101].…”
Section: Cecostomymentioning
confidence: 99%