2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1206-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of machine learning methods for cutting parameters prediction in high speed turning process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In anticipation of the next sixth technology revolution, it is becoming an increasingly important technique for processing large data sets using artificial intelligence and the integration of artificial intelligence algorithms in automated production. Many previous investigations have been devoted towards developing prediction models for rough turning [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Risbood et al [1] researched and produced models for forecasting roughness and dimensional deviation for dry and wet turning of mild steel rods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In anticipation of the next sixth technology revolution, it is becoming an increasingly important technique for processing large data sets using artificial intelligence and the integration of artificial intelligence algorithms in automated production. Many previous investigations have been devoted towards developing prediction models for rough turning [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Risbood et al [1] researched and produced models for forecasting roughness and dimensional deviation for dry and wet turning of mild steel rods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Bahkali et al [15] studied the effect of feed, cutting depth, radius of curvature of the tool tip and the cutting speed on surface roughness in turning cast iron. Mia and Dhar [16] developed an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict the average surface roughness in turning hardened steel EN 24 T. Jurkovic et al [17] compared three machine learning methods for predicting the high-speed turning observed parameters (surface roughness (Ra), cutting force (Fc), and the tool life (T)). Tootooni et al [18] reported surface roughness using a noncontact measurement method during the turning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SVM as a classification technique has its roots in SLT (Khemchandani & Chandra, 2009;Salahshoor, Kordestani, & Khoshro, 2010) and has shown promising empirical results in a number of practical manufacturing applications (Chinnam, 2002;Widodo & Yang, 2007) and works very well with high-dimensional data (Azadeh et al, 2013;Ben-hur & Weston, 2010;Salahshoor et al, 2010;Sun, Rahman, Wong, & Hong, 2004;Wu, 2010;Wuest, Irgens, & Thoben, 2014). Current literature suggests that the performance of SVM compared to other ML methods is still very competitive (Jurkovic, Cukor, Brezocnik, & Brajkovic, 2016).Another aspect of this approach is that it represents the decision boundary using a subset of the training examples, known as the support vectors.…”
Section: Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms In Manufacturing Applmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used Multiple Regression Analyses are based on many different regression models [23][24][25][26][27][28] . Many efforts have been made in order to achieve a highly accurate multiple regression model 25,[27][28][29] . However, the widely used regression models are quite trivial and their accuracy is in many cases quite low 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%