2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of LPV Gain Scheduling and Control Contraction Metrics for Nonlinear Control

Abstract: Gain-scheduled control based on linear parameter-varying (LPV) models derived from local linearizations is a widespread nonlinear technique for tracking time-varying setpoints. Recently, a nonlinear control scheme based on Control Contraction Metrics (CCMs) has been developed to track arbitrary admissible trajectories. This paper presents a comparison study of these two approaches. We show that the CCM based approach is an extended gain-scheduled control scheme which achieves global reference-independent stabi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by Lemma 2 and use it in Theorem 2, although (14) has to be solved implicitly as B depends on u in this case [12], [13].…”
Section: A Stability Of Generalized Sdc Control and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Lemma 2 and use it in Theorem 2, although (14) has to be solved implicitly as B depends on u in this case [12], [13].…”
Section: A Stability Of Generalized Sdc Control and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is not pursued here since most systems require a polynomial of high order to approximate the nonlinear dynamics and the computational complexity grows exponentially in n d , thus prohibiting the practical application. The connection between CCM and LPV gain-scheduling design is discussed in [24].…”
Section: B Quasi-lpv Based Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in [13][14][15]17], a convex optimization-based framework for robust feedback control and state estimation, named ConVex optimization-based Steady-state Tracking Error Minimization (CV-STEM), is derived to find a contraction metric that minimizes an upper bound of the steady-state distance between perturbed and unperturbed system trajectories. In this context, we could utilize Control Contraction Metrics (CCMs) [33,[77][78][79][80][81] for extending contraction theory to the systematic design of differential feedback control δu = k(x, δx, u, t) via convex optimization, achieving greater generality at the expense of computational efficiency in obtaining u. Applications of the CCM to estimation, adaptive control, and motion planning are discussed in [82], [83][84][85], and [78,[86][87][88][89], respectively, using geodesic distances between trajectories [49].…”
Section: Construction Of Contraction Metrics (Sec 3-4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, 4, and 6-8. This is primarily because the controller design techniques for control-affine nonlinear systems are less complicated than those for control non-affine systems (which often result in u given implicitly by u = k(x, u, t) [80,81]), but still utilizable even for the latter, e.g., by treating u as another control input (see Example 3.1), or by solving the implicit equation u = k(x, u, t) iteratively with a discrete-time controller (see Example 3.2 and Remark 3.3).…”
Section: Robust Nonlinear Control and Estimation Via Contraction Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation