2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of lipase and trypsin encapsulated in mesoporous materials with varying pore sizes and pH conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many lipases, including MML and ROL, are characterized by a lid that covers the active site in solution and which exposes it when in contact with a hydrophobic surface. As discussed in our previous communication, the environment inside the pores may be favorable for activating the lipase [9]. Many of the silanol groups situated on the silica surface are lost during the calcination step, which leads to the pore walls being 390 relatively hydrophobic.…”
Section: Catalytic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Many lipases, including MML and ROL, are characterized by a lid that covers the active site in solution and which exposes it when in contact with a hydrophobic surface. As discussed in our previous communication, the environment inside the pores may be favorable for activating the lipase [9]. Many of the silanol groups situated on the silica surface are lost during the calcination step, which leads to the pore walls being 390 relatively hydrophobic.…”
Section: Catalytic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown, for MML, that the pore size is critical for the loading capacity [9,26]. A pore size of 9 nm was found to give both high loading and good enzymatic activity while smaller pores gave both lower loading and much decreased activity.…”
Section: Relevant 270mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This technique is used to determine the amount of encapsulated protein (reviewed in 5 ), and sometimes also to monitor the kinetics of the immobilization 6 . A drawback often inherent to such indirect methods is high uncertainty and low sensitivity, and another limitation is the low time resolution that results from the time-consuming protocols for measuring protein concentration in bulk solution such as the Bradford method 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%