2015
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of line-transect distance sampling methods for estimating gopher tortoise population densities

Abstract: Line-transect distance sampling (LTDS) is increasingly used to estimate gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) densities. The process requires detecting tortoise burrows, and then determining occupancy. We compared 3 LTDS approaches that differ in how burrow detection and occupancy data are integrated, and 2 search strategies. Surveys were conducted at Avon Park Air Force Range in South-central Florida, USA, from April through October 2009. These include 1) LTDS using data from occupied burrows only; 2) LTDS wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend that all surveys report the number of burrows where occupancy could not be determined along with the survey results. If field conditions preclude the ability to effectively scope burrows (e.g., as in Castellón et al 2015), the method may not be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We recommend that all surveys report the number of burrows where occupancy could not be determined along with the survey results. If field conditions preclude the ability to effectively scope burrows (e.g., as in Castellón et al 2015), the method may not be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gopher tortoises can occur in naturally low densities in suboptimal habitat (Breininger et al 1994;Castellón et al 2012;Legleu 2012) or may persist at low densities because of past exploitation for food or inadequate habitat management (Hermann et al 2002). Surveys of low-density populations require considerable effort in terms of total transect length, and small sample size can reduce precision (Smith et al 2009;Castellón et al 2015). In these circumstances, there is a need for new approaches for LTDS surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated burrow densities using hierarchical distance sampling models in the package Unmarked in R (R version 3.2.0, http://www.R-project.org, accessed 31 Aug 2013) based on our LTDS data (Royle and Dorazio , Fiske and Chandler ). We used this method, as opposed to standard LTDS analyses established by Smith and Stober () based around single point and model estimates, and tested by Castellón et al (), to build higher confidence in our population estimates, while accounting for variation in burrow detection and density in a unified framework. We surveyed dune crest lines for tortoise burrows along the entire length of the constructed dunes and the 800‐m sections of each natural dune.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We scoped burrows only in winter because this is the period of lowest activity for tortoises at our site, and it minimized the chances of falsely declaring a burrow as unoccupied. The current recommendations for gopher tortoise surveys include scoping all burrows encountered (Smith and Stober , Castellón et al ). If this takes >1 day/site, tortoises may move between surveyed and unsurveyed burrows, increasing error rates in burrow occupancy estimates because of the potential to double count tortoises.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%