2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-007-9034-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of line extraction algorithms using 2D range data for indoor mobile robotics

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental evaluation of different line extraction algorithms applied to 2D laser scans for indoor environments. Six popular algorithms in mobile robotics and computer vision are selected and tested. Real scan data collected from two office environments by using different platforms are used in the experiments in order to evaluate the algorithms. Several comparison criteria are proposed and discussed to highlight the advantages and drawbacks of each algorithm, including speed, complexit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, two consecutive relay nodes should maintain LOS state. To achieve those constraints, a "Split-and-Merge" algorithm [9] is used to determine boundary points of segment in the path, if distance between two consecutive marginal points is greater than c r , a new point will be insert between those two consecutive marginal points to meet principle 2, now we get set of marginal points named as MP . Next, if any two points in MP can sight with each other and the distance between them less than c r , all points between those two points will be deleted.…”
Section: Node Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, two consecutive relay nodes should maintain LOS state. To achieve those constraints, a "Split-and-Merge" algorithm [9] is used to determine boundary points of segment in the path, if distance between two consecutive marginal points is greater than c r , a new point will be insert between those two consecutive marginal points to meet principle 2, now we get set of marginal points named as MP . Next, if any two points in MP can sight with each other and the distance between them less than c r , all points between those two points will be deleted.…”
Section: Node Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al [15] provide a thorough overview of line segmentation algorithms for planar data, and report on the promising accuracy and processing speed of the Split and Merge algorithm [18]. In order to further decrease the computational overhead of the algorithm, a simplification of the Split and Merge algorithm, the Iterative-end-point-fit (IEPF) algorithm [20] was used here.…”
Section: Obstacle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive research by Nurunnabi et al (2014) compares some of the existing algorithms. A similar comparison for mobile indoor mapping can be found in (Nguyen et al, 2007). For indoor reconstruction implementation, variants of Hough Transform (Okorn et al, 2010), (Oesau et al, 2014) and RANSAC (RAndom SAmple Consensus) (Dumitru et al, 2013), (Ochmann et al, 2014) are generally preferred in 2D processing domain beside plane sweeping by Budroni and Boehm (2010), or EM (Expectation-Maximization) by Thrun et al (2004) are applied directly in 3D.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%