2013
DOI: 10.3390/rs5115530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Land Surface Water Mapping Using the Normalized Difference Water Index from TM, ETM+ and ALI

Abstract: Abstract:Remote sensing has more advantages than the traditional methods of land surface water (LSW) mapping because it is a low-cost, reliable information source that is capable of making high-frequency and repeatable observations. The normalized difference water indexes (NDWIs), calculated from various band combinations (green, near-infrared (NIR), or shortwave-infrared (SWIR)), have been successfully applied to LSW mapping. In fact, new NDWIs will become available when Advanced Land Imager (ALI) data are us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
232
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
232
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The NDVI enables rapid and simple extraction of water bodies, and is thus considered to be one of the most successful water index methods [19,20]. The NDWI and MNDWI have been widely used to extract water body information in a highly targeted manner [21][22][23][24]. In some studies, NDWI has been recommended for extracting water body information; however, NDWI may be unreliable for shallow-water areas with a varied boundary [4,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NDVI enables rapid and simple extraction of water bodies, and is thus considered to be one of the most successful water index methods [19,20]. The NDWI and MNDWI have been widely used to extract water body information in a highly targeted manner [21][22][23][24]. In some studies, NDWI has been recommended for extracting water body information; however, NDWI may be unreliable for shallow-water areas with a varied boundary [4,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, NDWI has been recommended for extracting water body information; however, NDWI may be unreliable for shallow-water areas with a varied boundary [4,25]. Li et al [24] found that MNDWI is more effective than NDWI at distinguishing water bodies, and this may be attributed to the ability of MNDWI to distinguish built-up land areas from water bodies effectively [18]. Tonle Sap Lake is a shallow-water lake that is inundated by periodic flooding and contains aquatic plants as well as shoreside plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MVWR indicates more green cover at positive values, and more water cover at negative values. We selected MNDWI instead of the LSWI to calculate the MVWR because it has been shown in a number of studies that MNDWI is a more reliable index compared to other water indices including LSWI [41,42,46].…”
Section: Spectral Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sourced 1291 Landsat 8 OLI images that were acquired over the Volta basin (Landsat paths 192 to 197; rows 050 to 056) between 1 May 2013 and 31 October 2015, corresponding to the earliest complete month of data available in GEE and the temporal limit of GSW data. We used imagery that was pre-processed by USGS to Surface Reflectance and for each image, computed the Normalised Difference Water Index (NDWI) [40], Modified NDWI [27] using band 6 (referred to here as MNDWI1), and using band 7 (MNDWI2), indices that are commonly applied in peer-reviewed literature for surface water mapping [14,[41][42][43]. The relevant bands in Landsat 8 OLI imagery used to compute the three water indices are:…”
Section: Landsat-derived Surface Water Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%