1988
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/157.3.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Laboratory and Clinical Methods for Diagnosing Pertussis in an Outbreak in a Facility for the Developmentally Disabled

Abstract: During a pertussis outbreak in a facility for the developmentally disabled, culture- or direct fluorescent-antibody-confirmed cases were identified in 24 residents and 17 staff members; 38 (93%) were culture positive for Bordetella pertussis. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect serum IgG and IgA to the filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor of B. pertussis. Using criteria from ELISA values, we identified an additional 83 residents and 28 staff members as seropo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A specific medium for the culture of B. pertussis was described in 1906 (63), and the demonstration of serum agglutinating antibody for diagnosis was noted in 1916 (635). In the present era, the extensive acellular pertussis vaccine efficacy trials and other epidemiological studies have made it possible to evaluate multiple methods for the laboratory diagnosis of B. pertussis infections (229,293,310,315,317,337,493,536,693,719,722,740,781). Common laboratory diagnostic methods currently include culture, direct antigen detection (direct fluorescent-antibody [DFA] test) PCR, and serologic demonstration (ELISA with many B. pertussis antigens and agglutination) by measuring rises in titer or high single serum values.…”
Section: Specific Diagnosis Of B Pertussis Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specific medium for the culture of B. pertussis was described in 1906 (63), and the demonstration of serum agglutinating antibody for diagnosis was noted in 1916 (635). In the present era, the extensive acellular pertussis vaccine efficacy trials and other epidemiological studies have made it possible to evaluate multiple methods for the laboratory diagnosis of B. pertussis infections (229,293,310,315,317,337,493,536,693,719,722,740,781). Common laboratory diagnostic methods currently include culture, direct antigen detection (direct fluorescent-antibody [DFA] test) PCR, and serologic demonstration (ELISA with many B. pertussis antigens and agglutination) by measuring rises in titer or high single serum values.…”
Section: Specific Diagnosis Of B Pertussis Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of pertussis, avoidance of exposure is unrealistic since transmission is highest early in the illness and frequently occurs before a diagnosis has been made in the index case [24]. Prophylactic chemotherapy, primarily by use of erythromycin for 14 days in therapeutic dosage, has been demonstrated to be ecacious [36,130] when given to close contacts, especially if administered before secondary cases have occurred [125]. Whether chemoprophylaxis should be recommended to completely immunised (!)…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unexposed persons, healthy volunteers, blood donors) to help diagnose pertussis in numerous pertussis studies [42]. Another method deÿned the cut-o point as the maximum observed value in the control group to ensure maximum speciÿcity [43]. These traditional approaches to deriving diagnostic cut-o values are unsatisfactory for several reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%