2019
DOI: 10.1177/2325967118819831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Knee Abduction Angles Measured by a 3D Anatomic Coordinate System Versus Videographic Analysis: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Abstract: Background:Knee positions involved in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been studied via analysis of injury videos. Positions of high ACL strain have been identified in vivo. These methods have supported different hypotheses regarding the role of knee abduction in ACL injury.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to compare knee abduction angles measured by 2 methods: using a 3-dimensional (3D) coordinate system based on anatomic features of the bones versus simulated 2-dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(89 reference statements)
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 After reproducing the in vivo positions of the bones during the jump (Figure 4), knee flexion angle, patellar tendon orientation, and the length of the ACL and patellar tendon were measured using a standardized anatomic coordinate system ( Figure 5). 20,28,51 The flexion angle was measured about the femoral transepicondylar axis and defined as the angle between the long axis of the femur and the long axis of the tibia. Zero degrees of knee flexion is indicative of a straight knee, and increasingly positive angles are indicative of increasing knee flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 After reproducing the in vivo positions of the bones during the jump (Figure 4), knee flexion angle, patellar tendon orientation, and the length of the ACL and patellar tendon were measured using a standardized anatomic coordinate system ( Figure 5). 20,28,51 The flexion angle was measured about the femoral transepicondylar axis and defined as the angle between the long axis of the femur and the long axis of the tibia. Zero degrees of knee flexion is indicative of a straight knee, and increasingly positive angles are indicative of increasing knee flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,25 Knee joint kinematics and ligament deformations have been measured in vivo using biplanar radiography integrated with 3-dimensional (3-D) models of the knee joint created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 14,20,23,36,51 These joint models may consist of the femur, tibia, and associated ligament or tendon attachment site footprints. By registering the bone models to the biplanar radiographs, the 3-D positions of the bones at the time of radiographic imaging can be reproduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reproducing the in vivo positions of the bones during the full gait cycle (Figure 4), the attachment site to attachment site lengths of the ACL and its bundles, as well as knee flexion angles, were measured from the 3D models of the joint (Englander et al, 2019b;. Flexion angle was defined as the angle between the long axes of the femur and tibia about the femoral transepicondylar axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reproduction of the in vivo positions of the bones during the jump (Figure 2), knee flexion angle and the length of the ACL and its bundles were measured through use of a standardized anatomic coordinate system. 17,25,49 Flexion angle was measured as the rotation of the long axis of the femur relative to the long axis of the tibia with the femoral transepicondylar axis as the axis of rotation. Overall ACL length was measured as the centroid to centroid distance between the footprints of the femoral and tibial attachment sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%