2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of IR- and UV-laser pretreatment to increase the bonding strength of adhesively joined aluminum/CFRP components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, by laser cleaning the surface of the sample, a rougher surface is obtained, therefore improving the joining between the materials. This is in accordance with the pertinent literature [17,42], in which it is stated that the combination of the surface activation without affection of the integrity of the laminate due to the cleaning of the surface leads to the strengthening of the joint. However, it is worth to note that using the highest power level, i.e., 200 W, involves the adoption of a higher scan speed in order to keep constant the laser energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In fact, by laser cleaning the surface of the sample, a rougher surface is obtained, therefore improving the joining between the materials. This is in accordance with the pertinent literature [17,42], in which it is stated that the combination of the surface activation without affection of the integrity of the laminate due to the cleaning of the surface leads to the strengthening of the joint. However, it is worth to note that using the highest power level, i.e., 200 W, involves the adoption of a higher scan speed in order to keep constant the laser energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Currently, there is no universally defined tool for laser ablation; indeed, pulsed laser systems operate at different pulse regimes with wavelengths varying from UV to IR, which causes different interactions with the target material. For applications on CFRPs, previous works focused on excimer (λ = 308 nm) [12,21], Nd-YAG (λ = nm) [16,18], fiber lasers (near-IR range, λ = 1064 nm) [24] and CO 2 lasers (mid-IR range, λ = 10.6 µm) [9,23,25]. The different laser-CFRP interactions that can be realized lead to large variations in the treated surfaces, from a simple surface "cleaning", with little or no modification of surface layers, to a full removal of the matrix with consequent exposure of carbon fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to UV lasers, CO 2 laser has higher processing speed and larger processing area, which is suitable for industrial applications [23]. Besides, fiber lasers input larger amount of heat into carbon fibers, resulting in near surface substrate damage such as the fiber/matrix debonding [9,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser-treatment process can provide uniform surface behaviours to ensure high reliability and repeatability for aircraft structural repairs to avoid human errors and inconsistencies. Reitz demonstrated that wavelength and energy input are the critical parameters for laser pre-treatment, and UV-laser system can avoid near surface laminate damage while IR-laser breaks the fibre--matrix [ 37 ]. Henrik used a Nd:YAG laser to study the influence of adhesive properties in a standard SCARF repair process and showed that oxidized fibres can improve the adhesive strength [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%