2004
DOI: 10.1086/425316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Candidate Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources and Stellar-Mass Black Holes

Abstract: Cool thermal emission components have recently been revealed in the X-ray spectra of a small number of ultraluminous X-ray (ULX) sources with L X ≥ 10 40 erg/s in nearby galaxies. These components can be well fitted with accretion disk models, with temperatures approximately 5-10 times lower than disk temperatures measured in stellar-mass Galactic black holes when observed in their brightest states. Because disk temperature is expected to fall with increasing black hole mass, and because the X-ray luminosity o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
178
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(21 reference statements)
6
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, we replaced the three mekal components with a cemekl, which is a multi-temperature thermal-plasma model with a power-law distribution of temperatures. The best-fitting cemekl + diskbb + comptt model has c = ( ) km are consistent with the characteristic temperatures and sizes of the soft thermal components seen in other ULXs (e.g., Miller et al 2004;Stobbart et al 2006;Kajava & Poutanen 2009). The direct luminosity contribution of the disk in the 0.3-8 keV band is » 4 1 10 38 ( ) erg s −1 .…”
Section: Continuum and Line Luminosity Of Ulx-1supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Alternatively, we replaced the three mekal components with a cemekl, which is a multi-temperature thermal-plasma model with a power-law distribution of temperatures. The best-fitting cemekl + diskbb + comptt model has c = ( ) km are consistent with the characteristic temperatures and sizes of the soft thermal components seen in other ULXs (e.g., Miller et al 2004;Stobbart et al 2006;Kajava & Poutanen 2009). The direct luminosity contribution of the disk in the 0.3-8 keV band is » 4 1 10 38 ( ) erg s −1 .…”
Section: Continuum and Line Luminosity Of Ulx-1supporting
confidence: 71%
“…A great deal of progress has been made in recent years on the basis of Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra, firstly identifying soft excesses consistent with the cool accretion disc signature one would expect from a ∼ 1000M ⊙ intermediate-mass black hole (e.g. Miller et al 2003;Miller, Fabian & Miller 2004). Latterly this interpretation has been strongly challenged by the detection of a spectral break at energies of a few keV, identified in the best quality XMMNewton data for a wide range of ULXs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomena can be explained by several mechanisms, including a short-term super-Eddington phase [36], beaming [37], or normal accretion by an IMBH. Although the debate has not been settled, evidence favoring the IMBH mechanism over the other two has accumulated in recent years; these come in various forms, including spectral analysis [20,38], evidence for a low temperature ( 0:1 keV) black-body component [39], analysis of break frequencies of the power density spectrum [40], and observation of broad Fe lines and quasiperiodic oscillations (QPO) [41]. It seems that at least a fraction of the ULXs, in particular, the most luminous ones, are IMBHs.…”
Section: A Evidence For Imbhmentioning
confidence: 99%