1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92748-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Intensive Care in the U.S.A. And France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The APACHE II score is a well-established scoring system and represents a reliable pre- [16], and that it can be used prospectively as well as retrospectively [17,18]. Corresponding to the surgical literature dealing with the prediction of mortality by APACHE II scores, the expected mortality rates referring to a mean APACHE II score of 16 range from 35% to 50% [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APACHE II score is a well-established scoring system and represents a reliable pre- [16], and that it can be used prospectively as well as retrospectively [17,18]. Corresponding to the surgical literature dealing with the prediction of mortality by APACHE II scores, the expected mortality rates referring to a mean APACHE II score of 16 range from 35% to 50% [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed in 1981 at George Washington University Medical Center, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scoring system [1] was demonstrated to provide accurate and reliable measures of severity of illness in critically ill patients [2][3][4]. This model incorporated 34 variables, chosen and weighted by a panel of seven experts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of this approach was demonstrated by Knaus and co-workers [68] in 1982, in a study comparing the outcome of acutely ill patients treated in French and American ICUs. For patients with severe gastrointestinal disorders, the French hospital death rate was significantly greater than the one predicted in American hospitals (Table 5).…”
Section: Uses Of Prognostic Scoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%