2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concomitant boost radiotherapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
86
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
13
86
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…IMRT results in better dose conformation to the PTV and improved sparing of adjacent uninvolved normal tissues compared with conventional radiotherapy. Numerous studies showed a reduction in the incidence and severity of xerostomia following parotid-sparing IMRT [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], with post-treatment recovery of saliva production and resultant improvement in patient-reported quality of life [31]. Three randomised controlled trials comparing parotid-sparing IMRT and conventional radiotherapy were reported [12,32,33].…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMRT results in better dose conformation to the PTV and improved sparing of adjacent uninvolved normal tissues compared with conventional radiotherapy. Numerous studies showed a reduction in the incidence and severity of xerostomia following parotid-sparing IMRT [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], with post-treatment recovery of saliva production and resultant improvement in patient-reported quality of life [31]. Three randomised controlled trials comparing parotid-sparing IMRT and conventional radiotherapy were reported [12,32,33].…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 It does appear that chronic toxicity is decreased with these modalities, specifically chronic xerostomia. This is fairly significant and hopefully will translate into a better quality of life for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of deaths occurring in the first 5 years following diagnosis are attributed to primary cancer, further improvements in therapy would yield meaningful improvements in overall survival (19). The improved prognosis associated with oropharyngeal cancers in recent years may be related to increased utilization of concurrent chemoradiation, technological advances in radiation delivery and the increasing prevalence of HPV-related tumors (5,9,12). Caucasian ethnicity and high grade tumors have both been associated with HPV-related tumors and likely account for some of the improved prognosis observed in those subgroups (13,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of base of tongue and tonsil cancer in younger patients has increased dramatically over the past three decades (4). Several strategies designed to improve locoregional control for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy and altered fractionation radiation therapy, have been extensively investigated (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). However, curing the index cancer eliminates only one of several mortality risks faced by these patients (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%