2010
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.716.719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Infrared and Hot Blade Beak Trimming in Laying Hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all evaluated weeks, the birds subjected to laser beak trimming were heavier (p<0.05) compared with those subjected to conventional beak trimming with hotblade. This result is consistent with the findings of Dennis & Cheng (2010), who reported lower body weight in 5-to 35-wk-old layers submitted to hotblade compared with laser beak trimming.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all evaluated weeks, the birds subjected to laser beak trimming were heavier (p<0.05) compared with those subjected to conventional beak trimming with hotblade. This result is consistent with the findings of Dennis & Cheng (2010), who reported lower body weight in 5-to 35-wk-old layers submitted to hotblade compared with laser beak trimming.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Beak-trimming method significantly influenced weight gain in all weeks evaluated, with higher values (p<0.05) observer in laser beak-trimmed birds ( Figure 1). This result is consistent with the findings of Dennis and Cheng (2010), who determined higher body weight in 10-wk-old layers submitted to laser beak trimming. During the period of 9-12 weeks of age, hot blade beak-trimmed birds presented higher weight gain (p<0,05) than laser beak-trimmed ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ao se comparar a debicagem com lâmina quente ao tratamento por radiação infravermelha, em aves da linhagem Bovans White, constatou-se que o método alternativo de debicagem proporcionou redução da agressividade e melhores condições de empenamento (Dennis & Cheng, 2010). As aves tratadas pelo método de radiação infravermelha gastaram menos tempo se alimentando e apresentaram maior massa corporal, em comparação às aves debicadas por lâmina quente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The fact that the birds are debeaked and the type of debeaking affects the zootechnical indexes and the quality of the eggs (Mertens et al, 2009;Dennis & Cheng, 2010) makes the technique used to be extremely important (Vieita Flho et al Al., 2016). According to the above, the study aimed to evaluate three different methods of debeaking in relation to the zootechnical performance and its consequence on egg quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%