2017
DOI: 10.1111/his.13215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ALK gene rearrangement and ALK protein expression in primary lung carcinoma and matched metastasis

Abstract: ALK FISH results show more frequent discordances between primary tumour and matched metastases than ALK IHC, due probably to technical challenges and sample quality. This observation indicates that the quality of sample and technical expertise of the laboratory should guide the decision about ALK testing in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(134 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ALK IHC was performed on freshly cut 4‐μm thick formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue sections using the Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx assay. The anti‐ALK (D5F3 clone) rabbit monoclonal antibody was applied on a BenchMark XT autostainer with the Ultraview diaminobenzidine detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ, USA) . Staining was interpreted clinically as positive if tumor cells showed a moderate or strong multifocal or diffuse expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALK IHC was performed on freshly cut 4‐μm thick formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue sections using the Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx assay. The anti‐ALK (D5F3 clone) rabbit monoclonal antibody was applied on a BenchMark XT autostainer with the Ultraview diaminobenzidine detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ, USA) . Staining was interpreted clinically as positive if tumor cells showed a moderate or strong multifocal or diffuse expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FISH does not detect all ALK rearrangements and certain complex rearrangements reduce the distance between the two FISH probes, which can give a false negative FISH image [ 46 ]. Aside from the difference in sensitivity and specificity the discord can sometimes be explained by the intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity in terms of the ALK status, in particular when comparing IHC/ICC or FISH and methods using direct extraction of RNA without prior visual control of the lesion [ 49 , 101 , 102 ]. Certain isoforms of ALK arise from a mechanism of alternative initiation of transcription giving protein expression that is not ALK -positive with FISH [ 103 ].…”
Section: Methods For Detection Of An Alk Rearramentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 , 44 In addition, comparable expression of ALK protein by D5F3 IHC between samples from primary and metastatic sites has also been well documented with concordance rates of 94%–100%. 71 73 …”
Section: Ihc With D5f3mentioning
confidence: 99%