A Comparison of HMO Efficiencies as a Function of Provider Autonomy

Abstract

Current debates in the insurance and public policy literatures over health care financing and cost control measures continue to focus on managed care and HMOs. The lower utilization rates found in HMOs (compared to traditional fee-for-service indemnity plans) have generally been attributed to the organization's incentive to eliminate all unnecessary medical services. As a consequence HMOs are often considered to be a more efficient arrangement for delivering health care. However, it is important to make a distinction between utilization and efficiency (the ratio of outcomes to resources). Few studies have investigated the effect that HMO arrangements would have on the actual efficiency of health care delivery. Because greater control over provider autonomy appears to be a recurrent theme in the literature on reform, it is important to investigate the effects these restrictions have already had within the HMO market. In this article, the efficiencies of two major classes of HMO arrangements are compared using "game-theoretic" data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. While other studies confirm that absolute costs to insurance firms and sponsoring companies are lowered using HMOs, our empirical findings suggest that, within this framework, efficiency generally becomes worse when provider autonomy is restricted. This should give new fuel to the insurance companies providing fee-for-service (FFS) indemnification plans in their marketplace contentions. Copyright The Journal of Risk and Insurance.

Explaining the efficiency of local health departments in the U.S.: an exploratory analysis

“…Since its introduction, DEA has been used in several studies concerning the health care sector with Brockett et al [7], Bjorner and Keiding [5], and Bates et al [3,4] among the most recent. Hollingsworth et al [18], Chilingerian and Sherman [9], Worthington [39] and Hollingsworth [17] provide comprehensive reviews of the literature on efficiency measurement in the health care sector using nonparametric methods.…”

Potential “Savings” of Medicare: The Analysis of Medicare Advantage and Accountable Care Organizations

“…Essentially, for an inefficient DMU 0 , some other DMU or set of DMUs can use the optimal virtual weights selected as best or most favorable by DMU 0 and produce the same weighted output with less weighted input than DMU 0 . Each unit's evaluation involves a separate optimization, and therefore a distinct set of weights are computed for each unit (Brockett et al 2004). …”

“…The CCR and BCC models can be amended to compare one group of DMUs with another (instead of pooling all the DMUs together), as in the variable-benchmark model (Zhu 2009) or the Game-Theoretic Model (Brockett et al 2004). The efficiency score of a test DMU k (k ∈ G) is obtained by solving the following program:…”

“…5 In further discussion of the inputs and outputs for the various models, we note that one major objective of the ACA and Medicare reform is to provide health care services more efficiently in terms of costs and availability. Accordingly, Models 1, 2, and 4 of this current research follow Brockett et al (2004) and Yang (2014), who address similar goals but in a different context, to analyze the efficiency to provide health care services at minimal costs from the societal perspective. 6,7 Three output variables were selected in their research as measures of production output: enrollment, hospital patient days, and ambulatory encounters (outpatient services) 5 The results presented in this article are based on the particular DEA models and their inputs/outputs selected in this research.…”

“…Because the ACO data from CMS do not include hospital patient days as was used in Brockett et al (2004) and Yang (2014), the number of inpatient admissions is used instead for this research. This choice is further supported by the research of Chansky et al (2013), who examine three measures of hospital productivity based on volume of services provided and industry revenues.…”