2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of heavy mineral assemblage between the loess and the Red Clay sequences on the Chinese Loess Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent zircon UePb study also suggests a subtle source change across this boundary (Nie et al, 2015). However, heavy mineral data from Peng et al (2016) and the lack of sediment source change shown here (Fig. 2) do not indicate a source change at the Plio-Pliestocene boundary.…”
Section: Loess Source Regionscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent zircon UePb study also suggests a subtle source change across this boundary (Nie et al, 2015). However, heavy mineral data from Peng et al (2016) and the lack of sediment source change shown here (Fig. 2) do not indicate a source change at the Plio-Pliestocene boundary.…”
Section: Loess Source Regionscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…2) do not indicate a source change at the Plio-Pliestocene boundary. This means that either that the East Asian winter monsoon must also have been the main transport mechanism for the Red Clay (Peng et al, 2016), or that the westerlies transported material in the Pliocene from the same source, or a source with indistinguishable characteristics, such as that blown in by winter monsoon winds. This would be compatible with the evidence for a dominant NTP source for much of the CLP dust material (Fig.…”
Section: Loess Source Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some 19 different heavy minerals were identified, of which hornblende and pyroxene, unstable in fluvial bedload and post-depositional environments (e.g., Peng et al, 2016), and stable rutile, zircon, tourmaline, anatase, monazite, apatite, garnet, staurolite, ilmenite and magnetite appear in most of the samples. In contrast, pyroxene, anatase and pyrite were encountered in only a few samples.…”
Section: Heavy-mineral Analysis and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each sample, heavy minerals were separated using the dense liquid tribromomethane (density 2.89 g/cm3). Heavy-mineral separates were analyzed by QEMSCAN at Colorado School of Mines (Golden, CO, USA), following the procedure described in detail in [39][40][41]. From 290 to 398 heavy-mineral grains were counted in each sample.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%