2016
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of health‐related quality of life in 5‐ and 10‐year‐old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate

Abstract: Both 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with CL/P had HRQoL in the normal reference interval. Their general life situations were well adjusted to their clefts, but the older children with CL/P felt more excluded and less supported by peers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result corroborated several studies on the OHRQol of patients with clefts or facial alteration [17]. On the other hand, several studies with smaller cohorts did not show this difference [18, 19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result corroborated several studies on the OHRQol of patients with clefts or facial alteration [17]. On the other hand, several studies with smaller cohorts did not show this difference [18, 19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These similar levels of satisfaction are in line with earlier publications on comparisons of SWA scores between CL/P population and control population (Berger and Dalton, 2009;Feragen et al, 2015;Crerand et al, 2017). An earlier comparison of Swedish children also showed similar levels of general HRQOL in the CL/P population as in a control population (Sundell et al, 2017). The results may reflect some confounding factors discussed in earlier studies, such as gratitude or unwillingness to disappoint cleft teams caring for them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…[42][43][44][45] Because cleft-related treatments can substantially change appearance and speech, using scales that lack content validity for cleft lip and/or palate could make it appear that interventions do not improve outcomes, when in fact the scales might not be asking the right questions. The CLEFT-Q provides clinicians and researchers with a rigorously developed instrument they can use to measure clefts and the impact of treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%