A Comparison of Handwriting Systems Based on Different Style Characteristics

Abdulbaq, Huda Abdulaali; Mohialden, Yasmin Makki; Jabbar, Qabas Abdal Zahraa

doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2094-2_74

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The comparison also includes of handwriting or hand-printing; detection of alterations or photocopier and computer manipulations; restoration or decipherment of erased and obliterated writing; visualization of latent impressions; the identification of printing processes; and differentiation of inks. The work of Abdulbaq et al, 2021 supports that the current age of digitalization, recognizing the writer of a handwritten text plays an important role in information proceeding. Handwriting recognition aims to enable the machine to recognize the handwritten characteristics based on the digitalized images.…”

Section: Background Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 67%

Qsign Comparator Ex Tool for Handwriting Characteristics Analysis

Jay-lynne¹,

-²

2023

IJFMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The activation of electronic signature commences a new interest in handwriting examination in the field of forensic discipline and the criminal justice community. The study was designed to develop a tool that is more available and usable to the students or trainees in Forensic Questioned Document Examination. Waterfall software development methodology was used in this study which consists of several phases such as requirement, design, implementation, verification and maintenance. This Handwriting Analysis Tool enables the users to experience its features through web browser. Several significant features of this tool are the following; actual signature comparison, navigation, characteristics labelling, snapshot and the over-all conclusion of the examination. This effort may increase the technical competency of the students in a specific handwriting examination.

show abstract

Section: Background Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 67%