2016
DOI: 10.1123/jab.2015-0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude for the Barbell, Band, and American Hip Thrust Variations

Abstract: Bridging exercise variations are well researched and commonly employed for both rehabilitation and sport performance. However, resisted bridge exercise variations have not yet been compared in a controlled experimental study. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the differences in upper and lower gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis electromyography (EMG) amplitude for the barbell, band, and American hip thrust variations. Thirteen healthy female subjects (age = 28.9 y; height =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the six repetitions, we excluded the first and the last to avoid any possible confounding factor related to the beginning and the end of each set and to further exclude any symptom of fatigue. Thereafter, the sEMG RMS of each muscle during each exercise was normalized for its respective maximal voluntary isometric activation [ 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 ] and inserted into the data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the six repetitions, we excluded the first and the last to avoid any possible confounding factor related to the beginning and the end of each set and to further exclude any symptom of fatigue. Thereafter, the sEMG RMS of each muscle during each exercise was normalized for its respective maximal voluntary isometric activation [ 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 ] and inserted into the data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do that, two 3 s MVICs trials were recorded for each muscle in a randomized manner, with approximately a 10 s rest interval between each contraction and 2 min between the MVIC measure of each muscle [ 17 ]. The MVIC was determined as an average amplitude over a one-second window of the highest rectified EMG signals (root-mean-square, RMS) with a 100 ms window [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we intended to also include the quadriceps muscles, however; several participants were not able to use their preferred technique without scraping the barbell against the electrodes in the barbell deadlift with 1-RM loading, thus the quadriceps EMG recordings were omitted. The MVC for the gluteus maximus was performed with a straight leg hip extension instead of the prone bent leg extension which could have provided higher EMG activation (7,8). However, this would not change the results of the comparisons between the exercises in the study.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%