1990
DOI: 10.1016/0375-6742(90)90029-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of geochemical exploration techniques and sample media within accretionary continental margins: an example from the Pacific Border Ranges, Southern Alaska, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in consideration of many factors (e.g. Butt & Zeegers, 1989; Sutley et al , 1990). The sample density was a 100‐m interval for lines and 20 m for sampling sites and every sample (63 samples in total), approximately 1.0 kg each, was mixed with the collection from the top of C horizons of two 10‐m‐apart hand‐excavated pits (25–125 cm deep).…”
Section: Methodology Of Geochemical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in consideration of many factors (e.g. Butt & Zeegers, 1989; Sutley et al , 1990). The sample density was a 100‐m interval for lines and 20 m for sampling sites and every sample (63 samples in total), approximately 1.0 kg each, was mixed with the collection from the top of C horizons of two 10‐m‐apart hand‐excavated pits (25–125 cm deep).…”
Section: Methodology Of Geochemical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stednick and Riese (1987) discussed biogeochemistry for exploration in Colorado; Williams et al (1987) discussed the exploration significance of ammonium in silicates. Sutley et al (1990) reviewed the utility of various exploration techniques in Alaska.…”
Section: Models: Exploration and Laboratory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%