5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998) 1998
DOI: 10.21437/icslp.1998-236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of fusion techniques in mel-cepstral based speaker identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the fundamental frequency has been used in addition with the cepstral vectors to improve recognition accuracy. In general, vector concatenation is termed as classifier input fusion [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also the fundamental frequency has been used in addition with the cepstral vectors to improve recognition accuracy. In general, vector concatenation is termed as classifier input fusion [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classifier output fusion, each individual data source is modeled separately, and the outputs of the individual classifier scores are combined to give the overall match score. For instance, output fusion of the cepstral and delta-cepstral features has been performed using VQ codebooks [14] and Gaussian mixture models [12] as the individual classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation