2016
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17050724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Fresh Frozen vs. Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Specimens of Canine Mammary Tumors via Branched-DNA Assay

Abstract: Mammary neoplasms are the tumors most affecting female dogs and women. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are an invaluable source of archived biological material. Fresh frozen (FF) tissue is considered ideal for gene expression analysis. However, strategies based on FFPE material offer several advantages. Branched-DNA assays permit a reliable and fast workflow when analyzing gene expression. The aim of this study was to assess the comparability of the branched-DNA assay when analyzing certain ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This wide variability could be explained by heterogeneity in study design, sampling, analysis methodology, population, geographic location, or diet; these variations are summarized in Table 1 [ 38 , 46 - 48 , 52 , 63 , 64 ].For instance, higher F. nucleatum detection is seen when using CRC tissue samples and whole-genome shotgun metagenomics sequencing methods, as compared with fecal samples or bacterial 16s sequencing[ 10 , 26 , 50 ]. Furthermore, caution should be taken when interpreting studies of FFPE samples, because FFPE samples provide a less accurate assessment of the microbiome when compared with fresh-frozen samples[ 65 ]. Finally, patients typically undergo bowel preparation when tissue samples are collected, which may affect Fusobacterium detection or abundance in tissue samples[ 66 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wide variability could be explained by heterogeneity in study design, sampling, analysis methodology, population, geographic location, or diet; these variations are summarized in Table 1 [ 38 , 46 - 48 , 52 , 63 , 64 ].For instance, higher F. nucleatum detection is seen when using CRC tissue samples and whole-genome shotgun metagenomics sequencing methods, as compared with fecal samples or bacterial 16s sequencing[ 10 , 26 , 50 ]. Furthermore, caution should be taken when interpreting studies of FFPE samples, because FFPE samples provide a less accurate assessment of the microbiome when compared with fresh-frozen samples[ 65 ]. Finally, patients typically undergo bowel preparation when tissue samples are collected, which may affect Fusobacterium detection or abundance in tissue samples[ 66 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with the human data, 50 out of the 76 common overrepresented pathways were also found overrepresented in the xenograft diabetic tumor compared to nondiabetic tumor, being mainly distributed in the same categories (Table S3). Using a more specific and focused annotation based on curated pathways involved in inflammation (Loza et al, 2007), the two types of human diabetic samples (TD and ND) were found enriched in genes participating significantly in 4 processes (Apoptosis, Glucocorticoid/PPAR, MAPK, and PI3K/AKT Signaling) when compared to respective nondiabetic samples (T and N; Table S4). Here, the overlap between both comparisons was even larger, TD having only one other term enriched (Adhesion-Extravasation-Migration).…”
Section: Tumor and Normal Colonic Mucosa Show A Common Signal In Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of such studies on BC samples, we decided to perform a pilot research on those 28 BC confirmed patients who had all of our inclusion criteria (between December 2013 and April 2014). Moreover, most studies measuring miR expression level have used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-paired normal and tumor tissue samples; whereas our study was performed on fresh frozen tumor samples ( 23 - 27 ), that their RNA yield was expected to be higher ( 28 ). Clearly, obtaining and preparing fresh frozen samples are much more difficult and time- consuming.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%