1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45985-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of freezing and thawing methods for the cryopreservation of human semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage recoveries of 34-76% have been reported by several previous studies (Behrman & Sawada, 1966;Beck & Silverstein, 1975;Keel & Black, 1980;Keel & Karow, 1980;Taylor et al, 1982), and depend to a large extent upon the cryoprotectant and the method of freezing employed. Cohen et al (1981) and Serafini & Marrs (1986), utilizing a similar MEP system, observed percentage survival rates of about 35-36%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percentage recoveries of 34-76% have been reported by several previous studies (Behrman & Sawada, 1966;Beck & Silverstein, 1975;Keel & Black, 1980;Keel & Karow, 1980;Taylor et al, 1982), and depend to a large extent upon the cryoprotectant and the method of freezing employed. Cohen et al (1981) and Serafini & Marrs (1986), utilizing a similar MEP system, observed percentage survival rates of about 35-36%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Reduced fertilizing ability of cryopreserved semen has been related to ultrastructural changes (Pederson & Lebeck, 1971), decreased penetration of cervical mucus (Fjallbrant & Ackerman, 1969;Urry et al, 1983) and decreased post-thaw survival (Keel & Black, 1980), and motility Keel & Karow, 1980;Thachil & Jewett, 1981). Several previous studies have examined the efficacy of various cryopreservation techniques for human semen (Zavos et al, 1980;Thachil & Jewett, 1981;Cohen et al, 1981;Taylor et al, 1982;Serafini & Marrs, 1986;Prins & Weidel, 1986). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of freezing on the motility characteristics of spermatozoa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of the fertility in the exposed man results from asthenospermia and teratospermia. The accepted levels in the general population of the country are: volume, 2.5 ml; motility, 60-90%; counts, >60 milliodml; necrospermia, 50% live; morphology, 25% abnormally shaped [Garcia, 19741. The literature data in a pool of the general population are: volume, 2.5 ml; motility, 60%; counts, >20 and >40 milliodml; morphology, 60% normally shaped and <15% abnormally shaped [Taylor et al, 1982;Brenner et al, 19871. In semen analysis results of 38 men with substantial exposure to lead, 60.5% showed increased absorption and some decrease of the ALA-D activity; there was also a significant increase in the incidence of asthenospermia and teratospermia. These alterations of the spermatic character were similar in groups A, B, and C (Table 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such individual differences in the response to freezing protocols have also been reported in other species [reviewed in 29] including humans [30, 31], although it has not been explained. There have been strain specific responses to cryopreservation between mouse strains, but not within individuals of inbred strains [32–34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%