2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00282.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four methods of analgesia in cats following ovariohysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
47
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the VAS was not sensitive enough to detect differences in pain levels over time in either treatment group. This result is supported by previous studies that failed to detect significant differences in postoperative pain quantification using the VAS in dogs (Hoelzler and others 2005, Marucio and others 2008) and cats (Tobias and others 2006, Benito-de-la-Víbora and others 2008). In addition, scales that are considered extremely subjective, like the VAS, have shown inconsistent results among different observers when used to assess acute pain in dogs (Holton and others 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the VAS was not sensitive enough to detect differences in pain levels over time in either treatment group. This result is supported by previous studies that failed to detect significant differences in postoperative pain quantification using the VAS in dogs (Hoelzler and others 2005, Marucio and others 2008) and cats (Tobias and others 2006, Benito-de-la-Víbora and others 2008). In addition, scales that are considered extremely subjective, like the VAS, have shown inconsistent results among different observers when used to assess acute pain in dogs (Holton and others 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For humanitarian reasons, when the pain score exceeded 10, an analgesic was administered. There are studies in which surgery was performed without the inclusion of such a control group (Brodbelt et al 1997;Mastroncinque & Fantoni 2003;Tobias et al 2006). However, the lack of this group did not allow us to conclude if the treatments provided an adequate analgesia for this type of surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,[28][29][30] It may be that the minor bleeding was only seen because of the magnification and illumination provided by the laparoscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%