2007
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200600281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Flow Dynamics and Flow Structure in a Riser and a Downer

Abstract: Flow development and flow dynamics were systematically investigated using local solids concentration measurements in a pair consisting of a downer (0.1 m I.D., 9.3 m high) and a riser of the same diameter (0.1 m I.D., 15.1 m high). Both statistical and chaos analysis were employed. Values for the Kolmogorov entropy (K), correlation dimension (D), and Hurst exponent (H) were estimated from time series of solids concentration measurements. Axial distributions of chaos parameters were more complex in the downer t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low values of entropy were found at this radial position (r/R = 1.0). As observed by Wu et al, [1] in the wall region of the riser, solids tended to form large clusters, especially in the bottom section of the riser, where solids holdup was very high. For the developed zone, the difference between core and wall regions can be easily be seen, especially in the case of lower G s .…”
Section: Kolmogorov Entropysupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low values of entropy were found at this radial position (r/R = 1.0). As observed by Wu et al, [1] in the wall region of the riser, solids tended to form large clusters, especially in the bottom section of the riser, where solids holdup was very high. For the developed zone, the difference between core and wall regions can be easily be seen, especially in the case of lower G s .…”
Section: Kolmogorov Entropysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[1] CFB risers have many advantages over conventional bubbling and turbulent fluidised bed reactors, such as high gas-solids contact efficiency and reduced axial dispersion. [2] On the other hand, it is been well-recognised that gas-solids two-phase flow in CFBs is extremely non-uniform, owing to the influence of a variety of phenomena, such as particle clustering, turbulence and interactions between particles and between gas and solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the flow characteristics in the riser have been delineated and understood in both the industrial and the academic fields. Due to the counter‐gravity flow, CFB risers tend not to have uniform gas and solids flow structure; with more particles accumulate at the riser bottom and near the wall inside the reactors . The nonuniform axial and radial flow structure has many disadvantages, for example, there is serious gas by‐passing through the core dilute region and extensive backmixing of solids in the wall region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to use RFMBRs more effectively and understand the gas-solid flow behavior, an understanding hydrodynamics of RFMBRs via numerical modeling is necessary [9,10]. The CFD approach as an emerging technique holds great potential in providing detailed information of the complex fluid dynamics [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%