2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00331-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
91
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Dalzell et al [41] demonstrated that Vibrio fischeri test is a sensitive bioassay for a wide range of toxic substances. In this experiment the results of luminescence inhibition test (ED50 value) did not change significantly after the red mud treatment in any soil layer.…”
Section: Microbiology and Ecotoxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalzell et al [41] demonstrated that Vibrio fischeri test is a sensitive bioassay for a wide range of toxic substances. In this experiment the results of luminescence inhibition test (ED50 value) did not change significantly after the red mud treatment in any soil layer.…”
Section: Microbiology and Ecotoxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study with Microtox at this WTP during the same period, Araújo et al (2005) found a mean toxicity reduction of 92.71%. Several authors have shown that Microtox test is more sensitive to the action of toxicants than respirometry (Kilroy and Gray, 1992;Dalzell et al, 2002;Ricco et al, 2004). On the other hand, respirometry seems to be more accurate than Microtox to assess the toxicity reduction at this WTP, since it is a more direct method for assessing sludge activity and thus toxicity to sludge (Ren, 2004) and the whole microbial community is involved in the process, instead of only one organism (Vibrio fischeri), in the Microtox test.…”
Section: Activity Respiration and Chemical Demand Oxygen (Cod) Reductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wastewater treatment is carried out by a combination of physical, chemical and biological methods, being activated sludge, the most used biological treatment, due to its high performance (Pujol and Canler, 1992). The activated sludge consists of a complex assemblage of micro-organisms in which a minor change in the environmental conditions caused by the wastewater composition or plant operation may lead to a cascade of events causing changes in the community, influencing the microbial biodegradation of certain chemicals, therefore, reducing the quality of the treated wastewater (Madoni et al, 1996;Forney et al, 2001;Dalzell et al, 2002). The functioning of a WTP to inhibitory compounds may also vary due to variable organic loading, biomass concentration, hydraulic residence time and a possible biological adaptation from the activated sludge organisms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the A. fischeri bioluminescence-assay is one of the most sensitive methods for a wide range of chemicals, compared to other bioassays (e.g., nitrification inhibition, respirometry, ATP luminescence, and enzyme inhibition) (Vanhala et al 1994;Dalzell et al 2002;Parvez et al 2006). Compared to the test using Daphnia magna, Microtox ® has advantages of short time for the test preparation (cultivation and reconstitution of bacteria) and relatively easier test method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%