1986
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(86)90027-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of five methods for assaying bacterial hydrophobicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
40
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not confirmed by the MATH data. The lack of agreement between water contact angles and MATH data has also been reported by others (29)(30)(31). Strains with a high ARR value, had a low MATH value whereas strains with a low ARR value had a relatively high MATH value, except for strain O8K(A)28.…”
Section: Cell Biophysicssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This was not confirmed by the MATH data. The lack of agreement between water contact angles and MATH data has also been reported by others (29)(30)(31). Strains with a high ARR value, had a low MATH value whereas strains with a low ARR value had a relatively high MATH value, except for strain O8K(A)28.…”
Section: Cell Biophysicssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although both procedures are most commonly employed to assess microbial CSH and both are thought to measure actual binding to hydrophobic ligands (52), a lack of correlation has been reported by other workers (9, 10, 13, 39, 52). Dillon et al (9) and Van der Mei et al (52) found better correspondence between the tests when they were applied to closely related strains, which suggests that the assays may measure essentially different cell properties. Hence, general conclusions regarding the impact of CSH on biotic interactions should be drawn very carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a common concern is that it is difficult to directly compare results obtained from different laboratories using different or even similar tests (8). Surfaces of spores are heterogenous and contain a combination of functional groups such as carboxylate, amine, and phosphate groups, which may account for some of the variation between the different tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%