2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of fatigue crack growth in resin composite, dentin and the interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soappman et al (2007) found a similar value for n (5.3 m/cycle) for another microhybrid composite (Vit-l-escence, Ultradent, Logan, UT, USA).…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Soappman et al (2007) found a similar value for n (5.3 m/cycle) for another microhybrid composite (Vit-l-escence, Ultradent, Logan, UT, USA).…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…This was reflected by the significant decline in TBS after the adoption of these two sealer removal protocols. Although the microtensile testing is quasi-static in nature, the results suggest the possibility of a lower resistance to fatigue crack growth during cyclic stresses or functional loading (31). This may lead to an accentuated breach of the coronal seal that allows ingress of fluid, endotoxins, and bacteria through the root filling into the periradicular regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Many of the specimens failed due to fatigue along the interface between the resin composite and dentin. These failures appeared to have occurred due to voids in the adhesive resin [42] and were minimized through careful control of the methods of preparation (i.e., etching time, moisture, adhesive thickness and curing time). Overall, fatigue crack growth rates obtained with the dentin inset specimens ranged from 2.0E-6 to approximately 5.0E-3 mm/cycle, which are consistent with those obtained in previous investigations using the standard CT specimen [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%