“…Part A of the WWFE-II was conducted between 2007 and 2009 and it captured full details of the theoretical models and failure criteria of the participants and the results of their blind predictions. A total of 12 groups, see Table 2, representing 12 failure criteria, have participated, and their methods covered the following failure models: - 3-D Maximum strain theory, referred to as Bogetti’s model, Refs [64,65],
- M icromechanical based H ybrid M esoscopic (MHM) 3-D approach, referred to as Carrere’s model, Refs [54,55],
- F ailure M ode C oncept (FMC) model, referred to as Cuntze’s model, Refs [62,63]
- M icro M echanics of F ailure (MMF) model, referred to as Ha’s model, Refs [56, 57] (The same referred to as Ha-Tsai in Refs [44,70])
- M ulti- C ontinuum micro-mechanics T heory (MCT), referred to as Hansen’s model, Refs [66,67],
- Anisotropic plasticity, bridging model and constituents’ generalised maximum stress, referred to as Huang’s model, Refs [68,69],
- Hashin’s model, Refs [60,61],
- 3-D physically-based constitutive model, referred to as Pinho’s model, Refs [48,49],
- Physically based 3-D phenomenological model, referred to as Puck’s model, Refs [50,51],
- Interactive matrix and fibre failure theory, referred to as Rotem’s model, Refs [52,53],
- Maximum strain energy method, referred to as Wolfe’s model, Refs [58,59] and
- Christensen’s theory, Refs [46,47].
…”