2014
DOI: 10.1541/ieejpes.134.596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Electric Power Smoothing Control Methods for the Distributed Generation System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods were proposed to charge/discharge power to/from energy storage (ES) systems provided in PV plants so as to compensate for sharply fluctuating PV power. Various ES systems are considered, including batteries, [6][7][8][9] fuel cells (FC), and water electrolyzers (ELY). Using ELYs for energy storage is beneficial in terms of environment because no CO 2 is emitted during hydrogen production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods were proposed to charge/discharge power to/from energy storage (ES) systems provided in PV plants so as to compensate for sharply fluctuating PV power. Various ES systems are considered, including batteries, [6][7][8][9] fuel cells (FC), and water electrolyzers (ELY). Using ELYs for energy storage is beneficial in terms of environment because no CO 2 is emitted during hydrogen production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrogen storage volume can be brought close to the reference level by adjusting the power generated by the FC in accordance with Eqs. (18) and (19). Table 1 gives the ratings of the PV system, FC unit, and EL unit used in the simulation, and Table 2 gives the parameters of the PV model.…”
Section: Power Generated By the Fcmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to reduce the fluctuations in the range of load frequency control (LFC), which varies from 2 min to 20 min, the smoothing constant is set to α = 0.002, as shown in Table 5 [6]. The cutoff frequency when α = 0.002 is 1.59 × 10 −4 Hz [18]. A PSIM (power electronics circuit simulator) is used in the simulation.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MA, the cut-off frequency decreases and the phase delay increases when the MA period T MA is set larger [7]. Therefore, the passband and phase delay of the MA filter can be adjusted by varying T MA .…”
Section: Filter Characteristics Of Ma Es1 and Es2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ES1, the cut-off characteristic becomes sharper and the fluctuation reduction effect increases when the smoothing factor is set smaller; however, the phase delay also increases, which means that appropriate parameter values must be selected [2]. In ES2 too, the cut-off characteristic becomes sharper but the phase delay increases with decreasing smoothing factor [7].…”
Section: Filter Characteristics Of Ma Es1 and Es2mentioning
confidence: 99%