2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of economic agent-based model calibration methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agent-based model calibration remains a very active field of research; sufficiently flexible and computationally feasible methods are recent and still under development(Lamperti et al 2017;Fagiolo et al 2017;Barde and van der Hoog 2017;Platt 2019). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agent-based model calibration remains a very active field of research; sufficiently flexible and computationally feasible methods are recent and still under development(Lamperti et al 2017;Fagiolo et al 2017;Barde and van der Hoog 2017;Platt 2019). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years agent-based technology has increased in popularity across a variety of domains ranging from epidemiology [42] to economics [43]. Meanwhile, significant advances in software testing have revolutionised the way we test complex systems, such as the emergence of fuzzing techniques to enhance the automatic discovery of security vulnerabilities [44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details about the validation and calibration of the model, see Teglio et al (2019). As pointed out by Platt (2019), further developments of agent-based model calibration techniques are required in order to definitively calibrate large-scale models, like Eurace; however, future research will explore the feasibility of a full calibration of the model or of part of it, by resorting to Bayesian inference.…”
Section: Policy Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%