1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00660-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of early and mid grazing season suppressive anthelmintic treatments for first year grazing calves and their effects on natural and experimental infection during the second year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicted FEC in the untreated groups were similar to observed FEC . Observed FEC increased as time progressed, and in studies conducted for a sufficient time period (>150 days) FEC reached a peak and began to decline (Jacobs et al 1989 ; Taylor et al 1995 ; Satrija et al 1996 ) although rebounded later. Model predictions were consistently similar to observations made for the ivermectin treated groups ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predicted FEC in the untreated groups were similar to observed FEC . Observed FEC increased as time progressed, and in studies conducted for a sufficient time period (>150 days) FEC reached a peak and began to decline (Jacobs et al 1989 ; Taylor et al 1995 ; Satrija et al 1996 ) although rebounded later. Model predictions were consistently similar to observations made for the ivermectin treated groups ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 A–E, both observed and predicted patterns showed initially an increase in PC as time progressed. Congruent with FEC, PC also reached a peak and began to decline (Taylor et al 1995 ). However, this was not supported by Satrija et al ( 1996 ), where predictions diverged from observed PC from day 100.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue has been addressed in a number of studies and the consensus is that animals treated in their first grazing season may display some reduced immune protection when subsequently artificially challenged with high infective doses of larvae. However, under normal husbandry conditions, second grazing season cattle (and adult cows) are exposed to only low levels of over-wintered larvae following turn-out in the Spring and consequently no significant negative effects on the occurrence of clinical disease or growth performance have been observed (Armour, 1989;Claerebout et al, 1998;Larsson et al, 2011;Schnieder et al, 1996;Taylor et al, 1995a;Vercruysse et al, 1995).…”
Section: Young Cattlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Anthelmintics are central to the control of these infections (van Wyk et al, 2006) and as a result many chemoprophylactic programmes have been designed for FGS dairy calves (Claerebout et al, 1999;Taylor et al, 1995;Vercruysse et al, 1995). Although chemoprophylaxis may not always be warranted in FGS dairy calves for the treatment of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections (Shaw et al, 1997), it will however help to mitigate the effects of challenge due to lungworm, which is important as it is difficult to predict when a disease outbreak due to lungworm challenge may occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%