A comparison of dose–response curves in cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapies

Warner, Lydia K.; Herron, William G.; Javier, Ricardo; Patalano, Frank; Sisenwein, Florence; Primavera, Louis H.

doi:10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<63::aid-jclp8>3.0.co;2-e

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results suggest that core relational themes are unlikely to dramatically change in relatively short periods of time. This finding is not surprising and is certainly consistent with the literature on interpersonal change, which indicates that relational patterns tend to be fairly resilient and resistant to change (Warner et al , 2001; Hoglend, 2003; Ahuja, 1995). However, with the exception of NRS, the other pervasiveness ratings did change in directions expected and generally followed the trend suggested in Crits‐Christoph and Luborsky's original evaluation (e.g.…”

Section: Are Changes In Theme Pervasiveness Detectable In Brief Treatsupporting

confidence: 86%

A comparison of CCRT pervasiveness and symptomatic improvement in brief therapy

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Are Changes In Theme Pervasiveness Detectable In Brief Treatsupporting

confidence: 86%

A comparison of CCRT pervasiveness and symptomatic improvement in brief therapy

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The finding in this study that the most change appears to happen in the first 3 months of therapy substantiates Lambert et al's (2003) finding as to the importance and prognostic value of this early period. Finally, this study's findings also support the existing literature that suggests that demographic variables such as gender, race, and age do not tend to moderate outcomes (i.e., Barkham, Rees, & Shapiro, 1996;Sandell et al, 2000;Warner, 1998).…”

Section: Discussion and Applications To Research And Practicesupporting

confidence: 85%

Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: An Effectiveness Study

Roseborough

2006

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Both the National Institute of Mental Health and the American Psychological Association have called upon psychodynamic practitioners to start demonstrating their outcomes. This effectiveness study attempted to begin to answer these calls. Method: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a multidisciplinary, psychodynamic mental health clinic. It used a single-group, within-subjects longitudinal design. The psychometrically validated Outcome Questionnaire was used as a measure of change. A linear mixed and random effects model was used to analyze the data. The aims of this study were (a) to look at whether patients improve and (b) if so, at what variables moderate outcome. Results: Findings suggest that psychodynamic treatment, provided within this practice configuration, is effective over time, producing moderate effect sizes, and points to the particular importance of the first 3 months. Conclusions: Findings suggest a common course of recovery, with some between-group variability.

show abstract

“…In conclusion, several analyses of the present study demonstrated that female clients remained longer in treatment than male clients. And although previous researchers (Kopta et al, 1994;Shapiro et al, 1994;Warner et al, 2001) have found a positive correlation between time in therapy and positive therapeutic change, these findings merely suggest that greater treatment retention may lead to superior therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to interpret the greater treatment retention among women in the present study as a superior outcome in itself.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 75%