2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different water models for melting point calculation of methane hydrate using molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the influence of different potential parameters, it is pointed out that different water models may lead to different phase behavior in decomposition. 26 SPC/E and TIP4P water models shows similar results and can both present the decomposition process of methane hydrate appropriately. Compared with water models, the applications of the TraPPE methane model and the 5-point methane model 27 reveal that the selection of methane potential function has much weaker effect on the decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the influence of different potential parameters, it is pointed out that different water models may lead to different phase behavior in decomposition. 26 SPC/E and TIP4P water models shows similar results and can both present the decomposition process of methane hydrate appropriately. Compared with water models, the applications of the TraPPE methane model and the 5-point methane model 27 reveal that the selection of methane potential function has much weaker effect on the decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The existence of empty cage greatly reduces the stability of the hydrate lattice and accelerates the decomposition. As for the influence of different potential parameters, it is pointed out that different water models may lead to different phase behavior in decomposition . SPC/E and TIP4P water models shows similar results and can both present the decomposition process of methane hydrate appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choudhary et al calculated the melting points of methane hydrate using TIP4P/ICE, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P, and SPC/E water models, respectively. The results showed that the melting points for methane hydrate at 10 MPa calculated by TIP4P/ICE and TIP4P/2005 water models were 325 K and 295 K, respectively, higher than that of the experimental results, while the melting points calculated by TIP4P and SPC/E models were between 270 and 265 K, lower than that of the experimental output [50]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate a more suitable water model under given thermodynamic conditions.…”
Section: H 2 O Force Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At present, there is no model that can perfectly characterize the molecules under all temperature and pressure conditions. [50] Figure 13. AOP of water molecules in methane hydrate adding methanol under different temperature.…”
Section: Effect Of Methanol Additive On Decomposition Ratementioning
confidence: 99%