2022
DOI: 10.3390/w14172696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Water Indices and Band Downscaling Methods for Water Bodies Mapping from Sentinel-2 Imagery at 10-M Resolution

Abstract: Satellite-based remote sensing is important for monitoring the spatial distribution of water resources. The water index is currently one of the most widely used water body extraction methods. Based on Sentinel-2 remote sensing image, this study combines area-to-point regression kriging interpolation, bilinear interpolation, and the Gram–Schmidt (GS) pan-sharpening method with the water indices MNDWI, AWEIsh and WI2015 to compare different water body extraction methods. The experimental results showed that all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fisher et al [17] reported -close to our results -overall accuracies of 0.98, 0.97, and 0.95 for WI, MNDWI, and NDWI for images from eastern Australia. Liu et al [30] also observed that WI achieved an overall accuracy of 0.96 and a kappa coefficient of 0.89, and AWEIsh also performed well with an overall accuracy of 0.96 and a kappa coefficient of 0.89. In this study, LSWI performs worse due to the limitation of the index in interpreting Sentinel-2 data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fisher et al [17] reported -close to our results -overall accuracies of 0.98, 0.97, and 0.95 for WI, MNDWI, and NDWI for images from eastern Australia. Liu et al [30] also observed that WI achieved an overall accuracy of 0.96 and a kappa coefficient of 0.89, and AWEIsh also performed well with an overall accuracy of 0.96 and a kappa coefficient of 0.89. In this study, LSWI performs worse due to the limitation of the index in interpreting Sentinel-2 data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3 and 4). The contrast between water and land is acceptable for MNDWI, although it is less accurate than WI and AWEI in predicting the fractional cover of small water bodies or small streams [30]. SWI is better than NDWI, AWEInsh, and LSWI for detecting small water bodies and river channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were more effective to detect surface water in urban and vegetated areas, despite that the detection in such areas is commonly difficult due to shadows (Feyisa et al, 2014 ). Shadows in urban areas are often misclassified as water bodies, as they have similar low reflectivity characteristics to water bodies (Liu et al, 2022 ). Fischer et al (2016) stated that WI and AWEIsh performed best, whereas the MNDW and AWEInsh performed less accurately, and NDWI the least.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water body index method [35] enhances the contrast between features by using ratios of remote sensing image bands (NDWI uses the second and fourth band pixel values, MNDWI uses the second and fifth band pixel values, EWI uses the first and fourth band pixel values). The commonly used water body indexes include the normalized difference water body index (NDWI), the improved normalized difference water body index (MNDWI) and the enhanced water body index (EWI).…”
Section: Water Index Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%