1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8656-5_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Vep Methods for the Assessment of Binocular Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viewing binocularly a monitor with a reversing pattern for approximately 40 s is the only participation needed once the electrodes are in place. Although some children will remain untestable [9], a short duration of the examination seems advantageous for successful testing. As the stimulus conditions may greatly influence the ssVEP response, further research is necessary to optimise e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Viewing binocularly a monitor with a reversing pattern for approximately 40 s is the only participation needed once the electrodes are in place. Although some children will remain untestable [9], a short duration of the examination seems advantageous for successful testing. As the stimulus conditions may greatly influence the ssVEP response, further research is necessary to optimise e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be a consequence of anatomical factors, or due to different stimulus and recording conditions [8,9]. It is not possible to place the electrodes with a constant relation to the visual cortex in the occipital lobe, and differences in this relationship may cause variations in linear components' amplitude and, to a lesser extent, latency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This phenomenon was called summation. Later on summation was found with pattern stimuli as well and was considered to be an expression of binocular single vision (Fiorentini and Maffei, 1970;Harter et al, 1973;Lennerstrand, 1978b;Groneberg and Teping, 1981;Jacobson and Lennerstrand, 1981). Retinal rivalry was shown to decrease the VER (Cobb et al, 1967;Lawwill and Biersdorf, 1968;Cobb et al, 1976;Matsuhashi and Oguchi, 1981).…”
Section: Binocular Ver In Normalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Swept-parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) is a rapid and objective test with promising capabilities for overcoming the limitations of subjective testing. Previous studies using both steady-state [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and transient [25][26][27][28][29] VEP have shown significant differences between amblyopic and fellow or normal control eyes with respect to threshold, amplitude, and/or latency. However the optimal stimulus paradigm for differentiating amblyopic from normal eyes has not yet been determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%