2017
DOI: 10.1515/forj-2017-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different tending variants in beech stands by the crown thinning and from the view of their quantitative and qualitative development

Abstract: Impact of tending on dvelopment of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) pole timber stands was analysed using different variants of the free crown thinning, i.e. the original method developed in Slovakia at the end of 1950s. Four variants of this method were compared: (i) -the free crown thinning on the whole area, the method of promising trees, later the method of target trees at stand age of 58 years. (ii) -the free crown thinning on non-whole area, tending realised inside of growth space of target trees only, the met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, therefore, the need to craft beech silviculture according to these issues, and a possible solution could be the development of alternative thinning methods which are based on the concept of crop-tree management [16][17][18][19]. This alternative method is based on the concept of selecting a limited number of target trees (a number comparable to the final density at the beginning of the regeneration period), which are the most promising individuals in the stand, concerning both economic value and ability to produce seeds [20,21], and localizing the intervention around these target trees by removing the direct canopy competitors [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, therefore, the need to craft beech silviculture according to these issues, and a possible solution could be the development of alternative thinning methods which are based on the concept of crop-tree management [16][17][18][19]. This alternative method is based on the concept of selecting a limited number of target trees (a number comparable to the final density at the beginning of the regeneration period), which are the most promising individuals in the stand, concerning both economic value and ability to produce seeds [20,21], and localizing the intervention around these target trees by removing the direct canopy competitors [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…occur. The BBD dynamics in beech stands can be corrected to a certain extent by various forestry measures, e.g., the interesting data about BBD dynamics in beech thinning forests were obtained in Central Slovakia [15]. In these stands we applied the methods of selective support of target trees combined with a sanitary negative selection of heavily necrotically attacked beech trees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%