2006
DOI: 10.2989/10295920609505256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different planting methods, including hydrogels, and their effect on eucalypt survival and initial growth in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, soluble carbohydrates can be inverted into starch or biomass. Overall, our data are consistent with previous studies, which have demonstrated that application of hydrogels to soils improved plant performance (Arbona et al, 2005;Viero et al, 2006). For instance, Arbona et al (2005) found that application of hydrogels to the substrate increased water content, leaf water potential, root biomass, CO 2 assimilation and stomatal conductance of citrus trees.…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, soluble carbohydrates can be inverted into starch or biomass. Overall, our data are consistent with previous studies, which have demonstrated that application of hydrogels to soils improved plant performance (Arbona et al, 2005;Viero et al, 2006). For instance, Arbona et al (2005) found that application of hydrogels to the substrate increased water content, leaf water potential, root biomass, CO 2 assimilation and stomatal conductance of citrus trees.…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Micropropagated E. grandis × E. nitens were more vulnerable to the combined effects of prolonged dry periods and air frost. Although it is common practice in forestry to use hydrogels during planting to minimise root water stress (see Vierro and Little 2006) In contrast to our survival findings, Watt et al (1995) suggested that hybrid vigour accounted for the 100% survival of micropropagated E. grandis × E. urophylla compared with 74% survival of macropropagated E. grandis × E. urophylla in the field in KwaMbonambi, KwaZulu-Natal (28°36′0″ S, 32°5′0″ E). Differences in precipitation across different sites (Searson et al 2004) may account for the differences in survival among eucalypt clones.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The 50% survival observed 14 months after planting is far below the 90% required by the forestry industry to recognise a clone as productive (see Vierro and Little 2006). Plants produced via micropropagation were probably more vulnerable to air temperature extremes coupled with low rainfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A seleção de espécie ou clones mais resistentes ao estresse hídrico, aliado ao uso do polímero hidroretentor pode trazer grande benefício à silvicultura, principalmente em regiões com maior problema de déficit de chuva. Viero;Little (2006), avaliando a implantação de eucalipto a campo verificaram que o uso do polímero aumenta a sobrevivência das mudas. A melhor resposta também foi obtida quando realizada a irrigação.…”
Section: Variávelunclassified