2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different methods to evaluate the wind induced forces on a high sided lorry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(b)), differences become larger, but however lower than 20%. As expected (Cheli et al, 2006;Sterling et al, 2010;Cheli et al, 2011a), the lateral force coefficient linearly increases passing from 01 to 451, then it remains almost constant (transition from slender body to bluff body behavior) and finally drops down to zero passing from 1351 to 1801. The yaw moment coefficient is instead almost symmetric with respect to a¼901 presenting its maximum amplitude in correspondence of 451 (Cheli et al, 2011a;Cheli et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Flat Ground: Aerodynamic Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(b)), differences become larger, but however lower than 20%. As expected (Cheli et al, 2006;Sterling et al, 2010;Cheli et al, 2011a), the lateral force coefficient linearly increases passing from 01 to 451, then it remains almost constant (transition from slender body to bluff body behavior) and finally drops down to zero passing from 1351 to 1801. The yaw moment coefficient is instead almost symmetric with respect to a¼901 presenting its maximum amplitude in correspondence of 451 (Cheli et al, 2011a;Cheli et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Flat Ground: Aerodynamic Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Experimental tests have been carried out, at the Politecnico di Milano wind tunnel (and are widely described in Argentini et al (2011)) on scaled models, representing an articulated truck as representative of a high-sided vehicle sensitive to cross wind (Baker, 1998;Rocchi et al, 2010;Sterling et al, 2010;Cheli et al, 2011a;Cheli et al, 2011b). Two scaled models of the vehicle have been reproduced in 1:40 scale and their main dimensions are reported in full scale in Fig.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that previous works (Bocciolone et al, 2008;Sterling et al, 2010) using the same WT had adopted a larger scale. However, in order to ensure consistency with bridge aerodynamic experiments that were being undertaken as part of a larger project (and not reported here in order to maintain commercial confidence), the scale of 1:40 was adopted.…”
Section: Bridge Deck and Vehicle Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To apply such an approach, all the information relating to the interaction between the fluctuating nature of the wind field and the resulting complex flow field around the vehicle is expressed in terms of a series of nondimensional parameters, i.e., the aerodynamic force/moment coefficients. Their magnitudes depend on the geometrical features of the vehicle, on the characteristics of the impinging wind and also on the local topography; such coefficients are usually obtained empirically from wind tunnel (WT) simulations, numerical simulations (CFD), full-scale (FS) experiments or a combination of all three (Sterling et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation