A comparison of different Malaise trap types

Abstract

Recent reports on insect decline have highlighted the need for long‐term data on insect communities towards identifying their trends and drivers. With the launch of many new insect monitoring schemes to investigate insect communities over large spatial and temporal scales, Malaise traps have become one of the most important tools due to the broad spectrum of species collected and reduced capture bias through passive sampling of insects day and night. However, Malaise traps can vary in size, shape, and colour, and it is unknown how these differences affect biomass, species richness, and composition of trap catch, making it difficult to compare results between studies. We compared five Malaise trap types (three variations of the Townes and two variations of the Bartak Malaise trap) to determine their effects on biomass and species richness as identified by metabarcoding. Insect biomass varied by 20%–55%, not strictly following trap size but varying with trap type. Total species richness was 20%–38% higher in the three Townes trap models compared to the Bartak traps. Bartak traps captured lower richness of highly mobile taxa but increased richness of ground‐dwelling taxa. The white roofed Townes trap captured a higher richness of pollinators. We find that biomass, total richness, and taxa group specific richness are all sensitive to Malaise trap type. Trap type should be carefully considered and aligned to match monitoring and research questions. Additionally, our estimates of trap type effects can be used to adjust results to facilitate comparisons across studies.

Building a Collaborative DNA Barcode Library for the Diptera of Churchill, Canada: A Resource for Northern Research

“…As dipteran are strong flyers, most specimens were caught using Malaise traps. Hence, they are commonly used to collect these taxa, but there can be some biases depending on the type of Malaise trap used, the material used to make the trap, and the type of attractant used (Betts, 2010, Martinez et al, 2020, Skvarla et al, 2020, Uhler et al, 2022). Despite the potential limitations of each, we believe that combining a variety of trap types and sampling methods allowed us to construct a robust reference library for the region.…”

An optical system to detect, surveil, and kill flying insect vectors of human and crop pathogens

“…The Photonic Fence is designed to be autonomous, making it vulnerable to theft of its components and housing. To reduce theft and vandalism, efforts must be made to obtain the acceptance and participation of residents and stakeholders in implementing a Photonic Fence system in their locality 235 – 237 .…”

Entomofauna asociada a pasturas tropicales Cenchrus ciliaris, Chloris gayana y Megathyrsus maximus

“…The abundance of insects collected in this study of 380 individuals could be related to the collection method used by entomological network, because there are other more used and relevant methods for recording insect diversity, such as malaise traps that allow investigating communities of insects. Insects on large spatial and temporal scales, becoming important tools due to the large number of specimens collected through passive sampling (Uhler et al, 2022). Therefore, the insect collection method must be carefully selected, in order to potentiate sampling of individuals and estimate the diversity adequately.…”