2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different container sorting systems in modern rail-rail transshipment yards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steenken et al [31] classified the main logistics processes and operations performed at these terminals. Transshipment operations of ILUs may be carried out in rail-rail, rail-road, sea-rail, sea-road, and other relations with the use of custom facilities and equipment [32,33]. Attention was drawn to the fact that currently, operations at transshipment terminals are not possible without effective and efficient information flow, the use of information technology, and appropriate optimization methods [31,34,35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steenken et al [31] classified the main logistics processes and operations performed at these terminals. Transshipment operations of ILUs may be carried out in rail-rail, rail-road, sea-rail, sea-road, and other relations with the use of custom facilities and equipment [32,33]. Attention was drawn to the fact that currently, operations at transshipment terminals are not possible without effective and efficient information flow, the use of information technology, and appropriate optimization methods [31,34,35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many analyses have been conducted in this field. Those analyses concerned among others: »» intermodal transport effectiveness (Monios, Bergqvist 2017;Santos et al 2015;Wiegmans, Konings 2015); »» handling process optimization (Boysen, Fliedner 2010;Cordeau et al 2015;Fedtke, Boysen 2017;Guo et al 2018); »» studies about intermodal carriages both in Poland and in the world (Flodén, Woxenius 2017;Grzelakowski 2012;Saeedi et al 2017); »» empty intermodal transport units management (Furió et al 2013;Hjortnaes et al 2017); »» localizations of the intermodal terminals (Limbourg, Jourquin 2009;Lin et al 2014;Brzeziński, Pyza 2020); »» environmental impact of intermodal transport (Arnold et al 2004;Braekers et al 2009;Craig et al 2013;Dimoula et al 2016;García-Álvarez et al 2013;Hjortnaes et al 2017;Jacyna et al 2017;Kreutzberger et al 2006;Li et al 2013Li et al , 2014López-Navarro 2014;Monios, Bergqvist 2017;EC 2015;Ritchie, Roser 2017;Southworth, Peterson 2000). However, current literature lacks reliable case studies showing a connection between the aspect of intermodal network modelling and GHG emission.…”
Section: Aspect Of Intermodal Network Modelling In Terms Of Environmental Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations ( 35) and ( 36) express the arrival time of the IT at the yard or railcar. Equation (37) expresses the relationship between the finish time and the start time of a task operated by an IT. Equation (38) indicates the time constraint of two consecutive tasks for an IT.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the scheduling problem of multiple cranes, some papers design certain principles for dividing crane area to simplify the task assignment [7,8,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Boysen et al [30][31][32] firstly developed the disjunctive crane area to avoid interferences among GCs in the rail-rail transshipment yard, rail-road transshipment yard, and quayside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation