2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Approaches for Formation Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots regarding Object Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, the measurements show no visible impact of the angular velocity/acceleration on the linear error for a smoothed trajectory in great contrast to previous measurements using unsmooth trajectories [10]. For this reason, a significantly higher formation speed can be achieved without reducing the formation control quality at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More importantly, the measurements show no visible impact of the angular velocity/acceleration on the linear error for a smoothed trajectory in great contrast to previous measurements using unsmooth trajectories [10]. For this reason, a significantly higher formation speed can be achieved without reducing the formation control quality at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…At the same time, these constraints also mean that the outer robots in a formation are subject to high velocities and accelerations whenever the formation changes its orientation. This strong excitation of the formation controller has a detrimental effect on the control performance and occurs increasingly with unsmooth formation paths [10]. For this reason, [11] developed an approach that bridges the aforementioned gap between path planning and formation control while also generating smooth trajectories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wheeled mobile robots have been one of the most studied robotic platforms due to their applicability and motion capabilities. In the field of multi-agent systems (MAS), control schemes for collaborative wheeled robots have been developed for environmental sensing [ 1 ], task allocation for search and rescue [ 2 ], coverage control for precision agriculture [ 3 ] and object transportation [ 4 ], among others. For such applications, different control protocols have been reported in the literature, using centralized methods that depend on a global coordinate system as a first attempt, e.g., [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another publication Recker et al[17] we have already investigated the theoretical accuracy of our formation control and developed mechanical compensation units to compensate for the lateral errors within the formation. Due to the mechanical design of the compensation units, they can only compensate errors of individual robots up to 100 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%