2016
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Age Estimation Methods of the Adult Pelvis

Abstract: The adult human pelvis is useful to estimate age because it contains three age indicators-the pubic symphysis, auricular surface, and acetabulum. This study tested the accuracy, inaccuracy, and bias of age estimation from the Suchey-Brooks pubic symphysis, Osborne auricular surface, Rissech and Calce acetabulum aging methods, and a summary age of these indicators. The study sample consisted of 212 White individuals with known age and sex from the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection. The Rissech method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias values show that our methods consistently overestimate the ages of young individuals (< 40) and underestimate the ages of very old individuals (> 60). When comparing our inaccuracy values to Miranker , we observe that our models perform least well for the 20–40 age group. Importantly, however, we show that they are more accurate when applied to all other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bias values show that our methods consistently overestimate the ages of young individuals (< 40) and underestimate the ages of very old individuals (> 60). When comparing our inaccuracy values to Miranker , we observe that our models perform least well for the 20–40 age group. Importantly, however, we show that they are more accurate when applied to all other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We evaluate the performance of our methods against recent publications by calculating the bias and inaccuracy values (Tables and ) for each of our proposed models as well as the mean of the age estimated and the correlation coefficient between the exact ages‐at‐death and the estimated ages‐at‐death (Table ). The bias and inaccuracy values are calculated using the formulae: Bias=estimatedageexactage/N and Inaccuracy=false|estimatedageexactagefalse|/N, where N is the sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forensic anthropologists frequently examine joint surfaces to inform their adult age estimates . All joints change with age, but some exhibit metamorphic change, while others exhibit degenerative change .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the goal of age estimation is to approximate the exact age at death of the individual, in practice, an estimated range is more commonly used. A recent study by Miranker applied current pelvic‐based age estimation techniques, including Suchey–Brooks pubic symphysis , Osborne auricular surface , Rissech acetabulum , and Calce acetabulum aging methods on a modern population of Caucasian Americans. Miranker’s study limited accuracy to the correct inclusion of four age groups and not a linear regression as our current study, but she found a highly varied range of overall accuracy of age estimation from a very low 59.4% to a high of 96.11% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex and age are two key elements critical to the creation of the biological profile in forensic identification. The pelvic bones are considered the most ideal structures for use in sex estimation .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%