2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2021.3091389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Deep Learning Methods for Airborne Lidar Point Clouds Classification

Abstract: The success achieved by deep learning techniques in image labelling has triggered a growing interest in applying deep learning for 3D point cloud classification. To provide better insights into different deep learning architectures and their applications to ALS point cloud classification, this paper presents a comprehensive comparison among three state-of-theart deep learning networks: PointNet++, SparseCNN and KPConv, on two different ALS datasets. The performances of these three deep learning networks are co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsurprisingly, the overall best results were achieved by the semantic segmentation methods, whereby the 3D network was better still than the 2D version and closely followed by random forest. With F1 scores over 97%, we reached the limits of ground truth quality [86]. Similar results can be expected from other point cloud classification networks [84,86,119].…”
Section: Stem Precision and Recallsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unsurprisingly, the overall best results were achieved by the semantic segmentation methods, whereby the 3D network was better still than the 2D version and closely followed by random forest. With F1 scores over 97%, we reached the limits of ground truth quality [86]. Similar results can be expected from other point cloud classification networks [84,86,119].…”
Section: Stem Precision and Recallsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…With F1 scores over 97%, we reached the limits of ground truth quality [86]. Similar results can be expected from other point cloud classification networks [84,86,119].…”
Section: Stem Precision and Recallsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…R. M. Asiyabi is with the Center for Spatial Information (CEOSpaceTech) of the University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest (UPB), Romania (e-mail: reza.mohammadi@upb.ro). information of LIDAR data [7], [8], and other EO data, using many different algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%