2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92238-4_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of DCT and DWT Block Based Watermarking on Medical Image Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DWT approach is an effective process and is probably superior when watermarking is applied to the entire image [ 29 , 30 ]. Determining a favorable watermarking zone for bit embedding is a complex process, and it must proceed through various calculative operations for setting up.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DWT approach is an effective process and is probably superior when watermarking is applied to the entire image [ 29 , 30 ]. Determining a favorable watermarking zone for bit embedding is a complex process, and it must proceed through various calculative operations for setting up.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was indicated by Dowling et al [44] in their comparison between the DWT and DCT block-based watermarking that the DCT approach is more effective at smaller block sizes while the DWT approach is probably superior if the watermarking is applied to the entire image. In [45], Al-Haj proposed using a combination of DWT and DCT to implement blind image watermarking.…”
Section: Selecting the Small Block Size For Embedding Water Mark Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also showed that the feature extraction by DCT with ANN yields a higher recognition rate. One reason is that most of the energy of the image is located in the upper -left corner of the 2D array, thus the DCT is more efficient, if the localisation of changes is significant [8,15]. Using only LL3 sub-band of DWT may affect the performance.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Anns and Hmm With Dct And Dwtmentioning
confidence: 99%